## Refer to subregulation 81(2)
The prescribed nutritional information declaration" means the following nutritional information in the prescribed format on any foodstuff with mandatory or voluntary nutritional information, as the case may be, on the label.
Nutrient
Unit of measurement
Per 100 g/ml
Per %RDA** Serving
Energy
KJ
Protein
g
Glycemic Carbohydrate
g
Total fat
g
Trans fatty acids
g
Total dietary fibre*
g
Sodium*
mg
* WHO Dietary Goals (see Annexure 3)
**RDA = Recommended Dietary Allowance for persons 10 years and older (see Annexure 3)
In the calculation of the energy value of a foodstuff for the purposes of the prescribed energy statement referred to in this Annexure the following conversion factors shall be employed:
- 1 g of total carbohydrates shall be deemed to contribute 17 kJ;
- g of carbohydrates expressed as monosaccharides and/or disaccharides shall be deemed to contribute 16 kJ;
- 1 g of starch and glycogen shall be deemed to contribute 17 kJ;
- 1 g of carbohydrates which reach the colon shall be deemed to contribute 8 kJ;
- 1 g of sugar alcohol shall be deemed to contribute 10 kJ;
- 1 g of protein shall be deemed to contribute 17 kJ;
- 1 g of alcohol (ethanol) shall be deemed to contribute 29 kJ;
- 1 g of fat shall be deemed to contribute 37 kJ; and
- 1 g of organic acid shall be deemed to contribute 13 kJ.
NUTRIENT UNIT OF ADULTS AND MEASUREMENT CHILDREN OLDER THAN 10 YEARS Protein g 56 Vitamin A mcg REa 800 Vitamin D mcgb 6 Vitamin E mg a-TEC 15 Vitamin C mg 75 Vitamin B1 or thiamin mg 1,4 Vitamin B2 or riboflavin mg 1,6 Nicotinic acid, nicotinamide or niacin mg 18 Vitamin B6 or pyridoxine mg 2 Folic acid or folacin mcg 400 Vitamin B12 or cyanocobalamin mcg 3 Biotin mcg 30 Pantothenic acid mg 5 Calcium mg 1100 Phosphorus mg 880 Iron mg 14 Magnesium mg 350 Zinc mg 15 Iodine mcg 150 Choline mg 435 Selenium mcg 55
- Retinol equivalents: 1 retinol equivalent (RE) = 1mcg retinol = 3,33 I.U (international units) vitamin A = 6 mcg trans ß-carotene = 12 mcg other provitamin A carotenoids
- "As cholecalciferol: 1 mcg cholecalciferol = 40 I.U. of vitamin D"
- "Alpha tocopherol equivalents: 1 mg d,alpha-tocopherol = 1 alpha-TE (tocopherol equivalents) = 1,49 I.U. (1 I.U. = 1 mg dl-a-tocopherylacetate)"
The WHO ‘s recommendations on diet and health are as follows:
Ranges of population nutrient intake goals
Total fat
15-30% energy
Saturated fatty acids (SFA)
PUFA’sn-6 PUFA’s
n-3 PUFA’sTrans fatty acids
MUFA’sTotal carbohydrate
Free sugars
Protein
Cholesterol
Sodium chloride (Sodium)
Dietary fibre
Fruits and vegetables<7% energy
6-10% energy
5-8% energy
1-2% energy
<1% energy
By difference55 to 75%
<10% energy
10-15% energy
< 300 mg/day
< 5 g/day (<2 g /day)
20 – 25 g/day
> 400 g/day
Goals for physical activity
A total of one hour per day on most days of the week of moderate-intensity activity,such as walking, is needed to maintain a healthy body weight, particular for people with sedentary occupations.
Goals for body mass index (BMI)
BMIPopulation (adult) mean of 21 kg/m2
For individuals:
18.5 – 24-9 kg/m2 and avoid weight gain during adult life (> 5 kg)
The protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) of a foodstuff is determined according to the methods described in sections 5.4.1. and 8.00 in the Protein Quality Evaluation Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Protein Quality Evaluation, Rome 1990* and the method described in Food Technology, April 1994, p 74 – 77**.
The following requirements summarize the calculation of the PDCAAS of a food protein:
4.1 Analyze for proximate nitrogen (N) composition.
4.2 Calculate protein content (N x 6,25 or specific AOAC factor).
4.3 Analyze for essential amino acid (EAA) profile.
4.4 Determine the amino acid score (uncorrected):Uncorrected amino = mg of EAA in 1 g of test protein
Acid score mg of EAA in 1 g reference proteinReference protein EAA profile = 1985 FAO/WHO 2 to 5 year old requirement pattern.
4.5 Analyze for digestibility.
4.6 Calculate the PDCAAS:PDCAAS = Lowest uncorrected amino acid score x protein digestibility.
The following references may be inspected at the Office of the Directorate: Food Control of the Department of Health:
- * Protein Quality Evaluation Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Protein Quality Evaluation.", Rome 1990, FAO Food and Nutrition Paper No. 51.
- ** Protein Quality Evaluation by Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Acid Scoring,
- *** Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation. Energy & Protein Requirements. WHO Tech. Rept. Ser. No. 724. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland (1985).
- Food Technology, April 1994, p 74 – 77.
|
FACTOR |
|
|
MEAT, POULTRY AND FISH EGGS:
MILK AND MILK PRODUCTS
GELATIN
CHOCOLATE AND COCOA |
6,25
6,25 6,38 5,18 5,55 5,70 5,95 4,74 |
ANNEXURE 4 (Continued)
METHODS OF ANALYSIS (PDCAAS)
TABLE 7: TRUE PROTEIN DIGESTIBILITY VALUES
|
MAJOR PRODUCT GROUP |
PRODUCT |
TRUE PROTEIN DIGESTIBILITY VALUE |
|
Cereals and grains: |
||
|
Barley |
Barley |
90 |
|
Maize (Corn) |
Corn, extruded cereal |
62 |
|
Corn flake |
70 |
|
|
Corn, puffed cereal |
76 |
|
|
Corn, whole |
89 |
|
|
Corn, meal |
84 |
|
|
Millet |
Millet |
79 |
|
Oats |
Oat flakes |
70 |
|
Oatmeal |
90 |
|
|
Oat, quick oatmeal |
82 |
|
|
Rice |
Rice |
91 |
|
Rice germ |
87 |
|
|
Rice, brown, cooked |
72 |
|
|
Rice, high protein |
85 |
|
|
Rice, milled cooked |
86 |
|
|
Rice, polished |
87 |
|
|
Rice, crisped, cereal |
77 |
|
|
Sorghum |
Sorghum, cooked |
73 |
|
Triticale |
Triticale |
90 |
|
Wheat |
Bread |
96 |
|
Bread, coarse, brown |
91 |
|
|
Bread, white |
98 |
|
|
Bread, whole wheat |
92 |
|
|
Bran |
75 |
|
|
Endosperm |
98 |
|
|
Flour, 90% extracted |
89 |
|
|
Flour, 80% extracted |
92 |
|
|
Wheat germ |
81 |
|
|
Gluten |
98 |
|
|
Puffed wheat |
84 |
|
|
Shredded wheat |
73 |
|
|
White flour |
97 |
|
|
Wheat, whole |
87 |
|
|
Wheat, hot, cereal |
85 |
|
|
Wheat, 40% bran flakes |
69 |
|
|
Dairy Products: |
|
|
|
Casein |
Acid casein |
95 |
|
Casein |
96 |
|
|
Cheese |
Cheddar |
99 |
|
Cottage |
99 |
|
|
Lactalbumin |
Lactalbumin |
94 |
|
Milk |
Skim |
94 |
|
Whole |
94 |
|
|
Whole, powdered |
95 |
|
|
Whey |
Whey protein |
95 |
|
Egg and egg products: |
||
|
Egg albumin |
97 |
|
|
Egg, flakes |
92 |
|
|
Egg powdered, dried |
93 |
|
|
Egg, dried |
98 |
|
|
Egg powdered, defatted |
100 |
|
|
Egg, scrambled |
96 |
|
|
Egg, spray dried |
92 |
|
|
Egg, whole unprocessed |
97 |
|
Legumes and oilseed |
||
|
Beans (Mucunoa Spp) |
Beans, velvet |
68 |
|
Beans (Phaseolus Lunatus) |
Beans, butter |
57 |
|
Beans, lima |
78 |
|
|
Beans (Phaseolus Vulgaris) |
Beans, black |
69 |
|
Beans, brown, cooked |
79 |
|
|
Beans, common |
82 |
|
|
Beans, haricot |
71 |
|
|
Beans, kidney |
81 |
|
|
Beans, Natal round yellow |
80 |
|
|
Beans, pinto, canned |
73 |
|
|
Beans, red |
78 |
|
|
Beans, snap, frozen |
82 |
|
|
Beans, spotted, sugar |
81 |
|
|
Beans, sugar |
69 |
|
|
Beans, sugar, speckled |
78 |
|
|
Beans, white, kidney |
78 |
|
|
Beans (Vicia Faba) |
Beans, broad |
87 |
|
Beans, faba |
86 |
|
|
Cottonseed |
Cottonseed |
78 |
|
Cottonseed meal |
80 |
|
|
Flaxseed |
Flaxseed |
85 |
|
Lentils (Culinaris) |
Lentils |
85 |
|
Lupins (Lupinus Albus) |
Lupine |
76 |
|
Peanut products |
Peanut butter |
95 |
|
Peanut flour |
93 |
|
|
Peanuts |
87 |
|
|
Peanut meal |
91 |
|
|
Peas (Cajanus Cajan) |
Pigeon peas |
76 |
|
Pigeon peas, raw |
41 |
|
|
Peas (Cicer Arietinum) |
Chick peas, canned |
88 |
|
Peas (Pisum sativum_ |
Pea concentrate |
94 |
|
Peas |
88 |
|
|
Peas, green, frozen |
94 |
|
|
Pea flour |
88 |
|
|
Peas (Vigna ungulata) |
Cowpeas |
79 |
|
Sesame |
Sesame seed, dehulled |
82 |
|
Soy products |
Soybean |
91 |
|
Soy concentrate |
95 |
|
|
Soy flour |
84 |
|
|
Soy flour, defatted |
87 |
|
|
Soy isolate |
96 |
|
|
Soy protein, spun |
100 |
|
|
Sunflower |
Sunflower seed |
82 |
|
Sunflower seed flour |
90 |
|
|
Meat and meat products: |
||
|
Beef |
Beef |
95 |
|
Beef, low fat ground |
91 |
|
|
Beef, powdered, defatted |
97 |
|
|
Beef, salami |
98 |
|
|
Beef, stew |
89 |
|
|
Beef, steak |
97 |
|
|
Beef, tenderloin, roasted |
91 |
|
|
Fish and seafood: |
||
|
South African Hake (Haddock) |
100 |
|
|
Sardine |
95 |
|
|
Tuna, canned |
90 |
|
|
Luncheon meats: |
||
|
Canned frankfurters |
97 |
|
|
Chicken frankfurters |
97 |
|
|
Sausage |
94 |
|
|
Pork: |
Pork and loin and tenderloin |
98 |
|
Poultry: |
|
|
|
Chicken |
100 |
|
|
|
Chicken, dark meat |
92 |
|
Chicken, light meat |
93 |
|
|
Turkey breast, roasted |
91 |
|
|
Miscellaneous foods: |
Macaroni/cheese, canned |
94 |
|
Nuts and nut products: |
||
|
Cashew |
85 |
|
|
Coconut meal, defatted |
80 |
|
|
Pecan |
71 |
|
|
Starchy roots and tubers: |
Potato |
89 |
|
Vegetables: |
||
|
Cabbage |
88 |
|
|
Kale |
85 |
|
|
Rape |
85 |
|
|
Mustard |
82 |
|
|
Turnip leaves |
86 |
|
|
Mushrooms |
90 |
(ii) METHOD OF DETERMINING THE FAT CONTENT OF FOODSTUFFS
The fat content of a foodstuff is determined according to the method described in the latest edition of "Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Analytical Chemists" published by the Association of Analytical Chemists of the United States of America. Methods should ideally be based on acid hydrolysis of the samples before extraction.
ANNEXURE 5
LIST OF FOODSTUFFS AND INGREDIENTS EXEMPTED FROM A DATE OF
DURABILITY

The following references may be inspected at the office of the Directorate: Food Control of the Department of Health:
- Carbohydrates in human nutrition (1997): Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation., Rome.
- Greenfield H., and Southgate, D.A.T. (1992): Food Composition Data, London: Elsevier Science Publishers.
INS = International Numbering System
| * Albumin * Binder * Coagulant * Emulsifier * Globulin * Lecithin * Livetin |
* Lysozyme * Ovalbumin * Ovomucin * Ovomucoid * Ovovitellin * Vitellin |
| * Artificial butter flavour * Butter * Butter fat * Buttermilk solids * Caramel colour * Caramel flavouring * Casein * Caseinate * Cheese * Cream curds * "De-lactosed" whey * Dry milk solids |
* High protein flavour * Lactalbumin * Lactalbumin phosphate * Lactose * Milk derivate * Milk solids * Natural flavouring * Rennet casein * Sour cream (or solids) * Sour milk solids * Whey or whey powder * Whey protein concentrate |
* Bulking agent
* Emulsifier
* Hydrolysed vegetable protein (HVP)
* Lecithin#*
* Miso
* MSG**
* Protein
* Protein extended
* Stabiliser
* Textured vegetable protein (TVP)
* Thickener
* Tofu
* Vegetable broth
* Vegetable gum
* Vegetable starch
# Mostly produced from soy but may be manufactured from egg
** Sometimes produced from soy or wheat but now mostly be synthetic means
LABEL TERMINOLOGY THAT MAY INDICATE THE PRESENCE OF WHEAT PROTEIN
* All-purpose flour
* Bleached and unbleached flour
* Bulgur (Cracked wheat)
* Bran
* Cornstarch
* Couscous
* Durum wheat/flour
* Enriched flour
* Farina
* Gelatinised starch# (or Pre-gelatinised)
* Gluten or Vital gluten
* Graham flour
* High protein flour
* Kamut
* Malt
* Miller’s bran
* Modified food starch or modified starch#
* Semolina
* Spelt
* Starch
* Vegetable gum#
* Vegetable starch#
* White flour
# May indicate the presence of soy protein or may be manufactured from cassava (tapioca), maize or rice.
ANNEXURE 8 (Continued)
As described under point 6 of the Proposed Codex Document, Proposed Draft Revised Standard for Gluten-free Foods, CX/NFSDU 98/4 of July1998 or a final standard published thereafter.
The requirement to give QUID declarations will in principle apply to all food, including drink, which contains more than one ingredient.
* a single type of fruit in juice;
* a single type of vegetable in water; and
* mixtures of vegetables/fruit in water/juice where no ingredient in the mixture significantly predominates by weight.The exemption does not apply if, on mixed ingredients products, one or more is either emphasised in some way on the label or predominates by weight, because the amount of the ingredient can not then be calculated from the weight indications already given
Where the ingredient or category of ingredients
- appears in the name of the food; and
- is usually associated with that name by the consumer:
- The first part of this provision would require a QUID declaration where the ingredient or category of ingredients appears in the name of the food:
(aa) The ingredient is included in the name of the food Examples* would include "ham and mushroom pizza", "steak and kidney pie", "chicken polony", olive oil margarine", apple pie", "banana loaf", "honey and oats biscuits, and "tomato sauce" * In these examples it is the ingredients underlined which would require quantification.
(bb) The category of ingredients is included in the name of the food Examples** would include "vegetable/fruit pie", "nut loaf" and "fisherman’s pie" ** In these examples the QUID declaration need only relate to the total vegetable, fruit, fish or nut content of the product.
(cc) When the name of a compound ingredient appears in the name of the food, it is the compound ingredient which would require quantification. Examples are "seafood lasagne" or "biscuits with a cream filling". If an ingredient of the compound ingredient is also mentioned e.g. "seafood lasagne with prawns" and "biscuits with a cream filling containing eggs", it should also be quantified.
- The second part of this provision would require a QUID declaration on products where the ingredient or category of ingredients is usually associated with the name of the food. This is most likely to apply when products are described by the use of customary names without additional descriptive names.
As a guide for deciding which ingredients might usually be associated with a product identified by a customary name alone, it might prove helpful to consider what an appropriate descriptive name for the product might be, were this to be given. QUID should then be applied to the main or value ingredients identified, provided they do not qualify for exemption from QUID.
For illustrative purposes only the following examples are given:
Product: Example of descriptive name: QUID for: "Cottage Pie" Minced beef topped with mashed potatoes Minced beef "Chilli con Carne" Minced beef with kidney beans, tomatoes peppers onion and chilli Minced beef It is not intended that all ingredients associated by the consumer with a particular product name should require a QUID declaration under this part of this provision, or that each name under which a food is sold is ultimately linked to a specific ingredient requiring a QUID declaration. For example, "cider" would not require a QUID declaration for apples, nor "crisps" a QUID declaration for potato.
Where the ingredient or category of ingredients is emphasised on the labelling in words, pictures or graphics.
- This requirement is likely to be triggered when a particular ingredient is given emphasis on the label otherwise than in the name of the food. For example by means of flashes such as
* "with extra chicken"
* "made with butter"
* "with real Cheddar cheese"or by the use of different size, colour and/or style of lettering to refer to particular ingredients anywhere on the label other than in the name of the food.
This emphasis provision may not be triggered by the following -
- when a pictorial representation of a food as offered for sale is given;
- when a pictorial representation takes the form of a "serving suggestion";
- when a pictorial representation is descriptive of the agricultural origin of certain ingredients without emphasising the quantity of the ingredients concerned (e.g. a picture of wheat or hops on a beer label).
Ingredients used in concentrated or dehydrated form which are reconstituted during manufacture.
Regulation 22 permits ingredients used in concentrated or rehydrated form which are reconstituted at the time of manufacture to have their order in the ingredients list determined as if they had been used as "whole’ ingredients (e.g. reconstituted dried skimmed milk used in a milk pudding or dairy dessert). This same principle applies to the QUID declaration, which may be based on the weight of the "whole’ ingredient.
- The quantity of an ingredient or category of ingredients should generally be expressed as a percentage. The percentage may be rounded to the nearest whole number, or to the nearest 0.5 decimal place in those cases where it is below 5 %.
- The percentage should normally be calculated by using the same method as that used for determining the order in the list of ingredients. This means that the weight of an ingredient to be quantified would need to be divided by the total weight of all of the ingoing ingredients (except the weight of any added water or volatile ingredients lost in processing). For example, the fish content of a "fish finger" would be calculated as follows:
Ingredients: Weight: Formula: Fish 70 g 70 x 100 = 62.5 %
112Batter 20 g Crumb 20 g Total before frying 110 g Frying oil taken up 7 g Total mixing bowl 117 g Water lost from batter during frying- -5 g Total of ingredients 112 g However, care should be taken to ensure that the figure quoted is that which best represents the amount of the ingredient, or category of ingredients, at the time of use in the preparation of the food. Manufacturers should control process variability in accordance with good manufacturing practice in order to ensure that, as far as is practicable, individual consumers are not misled.
- QUID declarations should relate to the ingredient as identified in the list of ingredients. Ingredients identified, for example, as "chicken", "milk", egg", or "banana" should be quantified as raw/whole, as the names used imply use of the basic food because they carry no indication that they have been processed. Ingredients identified by names which indicate they have been used other than in their raw/whole form, e.g. "roast chicken", "skimmed milk", "crystallised fruit", should be quantified as used. Declarations of processed ingredients may be supplemented with "raw equivalent" declarations since this would help consumers compare similar products which have used ingredients in different forms. Where declarations for ingredients of compound ingredients are required, these may relate to the ingredient either as a percentage of the compound ingredient or as a percentage of the food. The basis of the declaration should be made clear to the consumer and should be consistent with the method used for ingredient listing.
QUID declarations on products (such as cakes, biscuits, pies and cured meats) the composition of which has been changed by cooking or other treatments involving loss of moisture should be based on the amount of the ingoing ingredient expressed as a percentage of the weight of the final product. For example, the butter content of a "butter cookie" would be calculated as follows:
Ingredients: Weight : Formula: Flour 100 g 50 x 100 = 29.6 %
169Sugar 35 g Butter 50 g Eggs 10 g Total mixing bowl 195 g Total after baking 169 g Where this calculation would lead to declarations exceeding 100 %, the declarations should be replaced with statements giving the amount of the ingredients used to make 100 g/ml of the final product (e.g. "made with X g/ml of Y per 100 g/ml"). Concentrated or dehydrated products intended to be reconstituted before consumption otherwise covered by this provision may alternatively follow the provision described in the following paragraph 3(c)(i).
- QUID declarations on concentrated or dehydrated products intended to be reconstituted before consumption (including dry mixes for cakes and desserts) may relate to the ingredients in the reconstituted product if the ingredient listing information is also given on this basis. Although the provision applies to products which are intended to be reconstituted by the addition of water, a similar approach may also be used for those products which are intended to (or which may optionally) be reconstituted by the addition of other liquids (e.g. milk or stock) if the ingredient listing information is also given on this basis.
- In deciding whether to give ingredient listing and QUID information based either on the dehydrated or reconstituted product, consideration should be given to avoiding giving QUID and any nutrition labelling information for industry sectors to ensure that a common practice is adopted for all similar products to enable consumers to make appropriate comparisons.
The glycemic index (GI) value of a given foodstuff shall be determined according to standard international methology as described by Volverer & Brand Miller.*
References:
- Brand Miller J, Foster-Powel K & Colagiuri S (1996): The GI Factor: The Glycemic Index Solution. Hodder & Stoughton, 10 – 16 South Street, Rydalmere, NSW, 2116.
The most recent method as developed by the microbiological laboratory of the Animal Nutrition and Animal Products Institute of the Agricultural Research Council of South Africa
The latest edition of the methods of the International Dairy Federation as adapted by the microbiological laboratory of the Animal Nutrition and Animal Products Institute of the Agricultural Research Council of South Africa
References 1 and 2 may be consulted at the office of the Directorate: Food -Control of the Department of Health.